Institutional Ownership and Firm Performance – Role of Managerial Efficiency: Evidence from Thai Stock Exchange

Authors

  • Penprapak Manapreechadeelert
  • Kusuma Dampitakse
  • Sungworn Ngudgratoke

Keywords:

institutional ownership, managerial efficiency, firm performance

Abstract

The purposes of this study are to investigate how institutional ownership (INS) impacts firm performance, and whether "managerial efficiency" can moderate the relationship between INS and firm performance. The study was conducted based on agency theory. The data were collected from the SETSMART database, which includes information on companies listed on the Thailand Security Exchange from 2016 to 2021. The study used a process regression analysis with 2,104 observations, examining the relationship between institutional ownership and firm performance (measured by ROA and Tobin's Q), while also taking into account the managerial efficiency. The findings suggest that managerial efficiency played an important role in the relationship between institutional ownership and firm performance. This should be considered prior to making an investment decision. This study addresses conflicting arguments and gaps in the literature regarding the relationship between institutional ownership and firm performance, together with highlighting the importance of managerial efficiency in creating effective efficiency.

References

Abedin, S. H., Haque, H., Shahjahan, T., & Kabir, M. N. (2022). Institutional ownership and firm performance: Evidence from an emerging economy. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(567), 1-17.

Alajmi, A., & Worthington, A. C. (2023). Corporate governance in Kuwait: Joining the dots between regulatory reform, organizational change in boards and audit committees and firm market and accounting performance. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, https://doi:10.1108/ JFRA-04-2022-0133.

Andreou, P., Ehrlich, D., Karasamani, I., &Louca, C. (2015). Managerial ability and firm performance: Evidence from the Global Financial Crisis. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi:10.2139/ssrn.2633216.

Berthelot, S., Morris, T., & Morrill, C. (2010). Corporate governance rating and financial performance: A Canadian study. Corporate Governance, 10(5), 635-646. https://doi:10.1108/ 14720701011085599.

Bushee, B. J. (1998). The influence of institutional investors on myopic R&D investment behavior. The Accounting Review, 73(3), 305-333.

Butt, A. A., Rizavi, S. S., Nazir, M. S. & Shahzad, A. (2022), Corporate derivatives use and firm value: conditional role of corporate governance. South Asian Journal of Business Studies, https://doi:10.1108/SAJBS-02-2021-0059.

Chatterjee, S., & Simonoff, J. S. (2013). Handbook of Regression Analysis. (1st ed.). New Jersey: Wiley.

Chen, S. S., & Lin, C. Y. (2018). Managerial ability and acquirer returns. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 68(May), 171–182. https://doi:10.1016/j.qref.2017.09.004.

Cornett, M. M., Marcus, A. J., Saunders, A., & Tehranian, H. (2007). The impact of institutional ownership on corporate operating performance. Journal of Banking & Finance, 31(6), 1771-1794.

Daryaei, A. A., & Fattahi, Y. (2020). The asymmetric impact of institutional ownership on firm performance: Panel smooth transition regression model. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 20(7), 1191-1203.

Demerjian, P. R., Lev, B., &McVay, S. E. (2012). Quantifying managerial ability: A new measure and validity tests. Management Science, 58(7), 1229-1248.

Farooq, M., Noor, A., & Ali, S. (2022). Corporate governance and firm performance: Empirical evidence from Pakistan. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 22(1), 42-66.

Ferreira, M. A., & Matos, P. (2008). The colors of investors’ money: The role of institutional investors around the world. Journal of Financial Economics, 88(3), 499-533.

Hair, J. F., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Black, W. C. (2018). Multivariate Data Analysis. (8th ed.). Delhi: Cengage India.

Hambrick, D. C., & Quigley, T. J. (2014). Toward more accurate contextualization of the CEO effect on firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 35(4), 473–491.

Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. New York: The Guilford Press.

Hendriksen, E. S., & Van Breda, M. F. (1992). Accounting theory. (5th ed.). Boston: Homewood, Irwin.

Hood, M., Nofsinger, J. R., & Small, K. (2009). Identifying the non‐normality premium of an investment. Managerial Finance, 35(4), 385-403.

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.

Khurana, I. K., Moser, W. J., & Raman, K. K. (2018). Tax avoidance, managerial ability, and investment efficincy. Journal of Accounting Finance and Business Studies, 54(4), 547-575. https://doi:10.1111/abac.12142.

Kirchmaier, T., & Grant, J. (2006). Corporate ownership structure and performance in Europe. Accounting Management Review, 2(3), 231-245.

Kumar, S., & Zbib, L. (2022). Firm performance during the Covid-19 crisis: Does managerial ability matter?. Finance Research Letters, 47(Part B), 102720. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.frl.2022.102720.

Menard, S. (2002). Applied logistic regression analysis. (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

Navissi, F., & Naiker, V. (2006). Institutional ownership and corporate value. Managerial Finance, 32(3), 247-256.

Nurleni, N., Bandang, A., Darmawati, & Amiruddin. (2018). The effect of managerial and institutional ownership on corporate social responsibility disclosure. International Journal of Law and Management, 60(4), 979-987.

Pound, J. (1998). Proxy contests and the efficiency of shareholder oversight. Journal of Financial Economics, 20(1-2), 237-265.

Sakawa, H., & Watanabel, N. (2020). Institutional ownership and firm performance under stakeholder-oriented corporate governance. Sustainability, 12(3), 1021. https://doi:10.3390/ su12031021.

Saleh, M. W. A., Eleyan, D., & Maigoshi, Z. S. (2022). Moderating effect of CEO power on institutional ownership and performance. EuroMed Journal of Business, https://doi:10.1108/ EMJB-12-2021-0193

Salehi, M., Bazrafshan, A., & Hosseinkamal, M. (2021). The relationship between supervision quality, CEO’s ability and authority with firm performance. Journal of Facilities Management, 19(2), 150–173.

SEC. (2022). The growth in Thai stock market investors. Retrieved February 24, 2023, from https://weblink.set.or.th/dat/vdoArticle/attachFile/AttachFile_1646880706843.pdf.

Simamora, A. J. (2023). Firms performance, risk taking and managerial ability. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 72(3), 789–808.

Ting, I. W. K., Tebourbi, I., Lu, W.-M., & Kweh, Q. L. (2021). The effects of managerial ability on firm performance and the mediating role of capital structure: Evidence from Taiwan. Financial Innovation, 7, 89. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-021-00320-7

Tsouknidis, D. A. (2019). The effect of institutional ownership on firm performance: The case of U.S.-listed shipping companies. Maritime Policy & Management, 46(5), 509-528.

Downloads

Published

2024-01-15